Legal Opinion

Providence Granite Co. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 6, 1972PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a substitute outline bill of exceptions arising out of an action for breach of contract. The plaintiff corporation, Providence Granite Co., Inc. (Providence), alleges that it had a contract to furnish certain construction stone to the defendant corporation, Joseph Rugo, Inc. (Rugo). Providence seeks loss of profits as damages result*889ing from Rugo’s refusal to accept deliveries. The case was tried by a judge of the Superior Court without a jury and he entered a finding for Providence in the amount of $12,795. Rugo thereafter filed this bill of exceptions. Upon appropriate proof, lost…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. White Spot Construction Corp. v. Jet Spray Cooler, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel Corporation, Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. Brewster Wallcovering Co. v. Blue Mountain Wallcoverings, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Robert Urico v. Parnell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  5. Lewis v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API