Legal Opinion

Cuming v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1881PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Kent. Bill to enjoin collection of special assessment. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is a bill in equity to enjoin the collection of an assessment for the improvement of certain portions of streets in Grand Bapids, known as Bronson street, Crescent avenue and Bostwick street, under proceedings of the common council which are supposed to be void. The bill was demurred to and dismissed, and complainant appeals. The ground of invalidity chiefly relied upon is that Crescent avenue and parts of two streets were all to be improved in a single proceeding and by a single assessment; which, it is insisted, is unauthorized by law; but there are also various minor objections.

I. It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stockle v. SilsbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Arnold v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Beniteau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crampton v. City of Royal OakMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Goodwillie v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Davies v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. City of Tulsa v. WestonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Gratz v. City of Kirk-WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API