Legal Opinion

Herrman v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 15, 1962No. [App. No. 52, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The applicant, Jack E. Herrman, who had been sentenced to imprisonment for robbery with a deadly weapon, was found by a jury to be a defective delinquent and he now seeks leave to appeal from that determination. The applicant, who comes from a broken home, has an extensive record of unlawful activity beginning at the age of ten. He is now eighteen.

The State argues that the present application, filed on February 16, 1962, should be dismissed since it was not filed within thirty days from the passage on October 27, 1961, of the order appealed from. Code (1961 Cum. Supp.), Art. 31 B, Sec. 11.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. Brown v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Barnes v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Ambrose v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crews v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Wise v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Mastromarino v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Elliott v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API