State v. . Koritz
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The defendants have abandoned all their exceptions, save the first four, which go to the competency of the petit jurors selected to try the consolidated cases. When all is said and done in respect of these exceptions, we are met with the paramount fact that the jury as finally selected was satisfactory to the defendants, and they were not required to take any juror over objection. They announced their contentment with the jury without exhausting all their peremptory challenges. It was composed of 7 white men and 5 Negroes.
In respect of special veniremen summoned to serve as petit jurors, a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. SpellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.