Legal Opinion

Gerould v. . Wilson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1880PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from order of the General Term, of the Supreme Court, in the fourth judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant James R. Wilson, entered upon the report of a referee. (Reported below, 16 Hun, 530.) This action, was upon a bond, given by defendant Byron H. Wilson, as administrator of the estate of James Wilson, deceased. Defendant James B. Wilson, one of the sureties alone appeared and answered.

Read the full summary

Appeal from order of the General Term, of the Supreme Court, in the fourth judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant James R. Wilson, entered upon the report of a referee. (Reported below, 16 Hun, 530.) This action, was upon a bond, given by defendant Byron H. Wilson, as administrator of the estate of James Wilson, deceased. Defendant James B. Wilson, one of the sureties alone appeared and answered. J Letters of administration were issued to said Byron LI. Wilson, by the surrogate of the county of Steuben, in May, 1864, aud on the same day the bond was delivered to said…

1Opinion of the Court

Folger, Ch. J.

The objection made by the defendant to the

bond is not valid. The Bevised Statutes (2 B. S. 77, § 42), do not prescribe the tenor (Doug. 193; 7 Exch. 537, *561) of the condition of the bond to he given by an administrator; they prescribe the substance. The bond would have been more even with the facts and the intention of the Probate Court, and of the parties who signed it, had it named the surrogate of Steuben county instead of naming the surrogate of Ontario county. But that part may be left out in reading, and still there is enough to square with the requirement of the statute,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Casoni v. . JeromeNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Scofield v. . ChurchillNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Burrall v. AckerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
  4. Dakin v. DemmingNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  5. Ring v. GibbsNew York Supreme Court · 1841

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bellinger v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Close v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Altman v. . HofellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Bopp v. HansfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Greer v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API