Legal Opinion

Greer v. McNeal

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 1902PublishedCited by 14 opinions

]¡rror from, the District Coikrt of Logan County; before Jno. LI. Burford, Trial Judge. On .petition for rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J.:

The statement of facts in the opinion of this court of September 4, 1901, does not correctly state the judgment of .the district court. It says: “A judgment for $2,403.33 found to be due, and the liability distributed so that the sureties upon the first administration bond, up to the time of MeNeahs release therefrom, were required to pay $1,759.06 and against the remainder of the defendants, including the plaintiffs in error, for $644.27, with interest.” The judgment that was rendered by the district court was as follows: That the plaintiff, T. F. McKennon,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Stovall v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Farrar and Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  4. Deobold v. . OppermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Choate v. ArringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. BurneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Pioneer Mortgage Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Boudinot v. LocustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API