Charleston Co-op. v. A. W. Allen & Bros.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Eourth District; Hon. J. E. Booth, Judge. Actions by Charleston Co-op. against A. W. Allen and Bros, a partnership, consisting of A. W. Allen and others, and by Louis Sweat against A. W. Allen and others, co-partners doing business under the firm name of A. W. Allen and Bros., in which attachments were issued. Judgment for plaintiff in each ease. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.
There are two cases, different plaintiffs against the same defendants, copartners in the sheep business. Bbth were brought to recover money judgments, one for a balance due for merchandise sold and delivered to the amount of $1091, the other for a balance due, amounting to $220, on a promissory note.
*576In both cases, attachments were issued and levied on personal property in the possession of the defendants, and alleged to be owned by them, consisting of about 360 head of sheep and fire stacks of hay. In the one the attachment was sought on the ground that the defendants had assigned and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reed v. PelletierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
- Anderson v. PattersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Leser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Roy v. Union Mercantile Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1891
- Schwabacker v. RushIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martin Machinery, Inc. v. Strevell-Paterson Finance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1958