Legal Opinion

Roy v. Union Mercantile Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from district court, Laramie county. Action by the Union Mercantile Company against Horace A. Roy. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtConaway, J.

This cause, which is brought in this court by petition in error by Horace A. Roy, who was defendant below, was begun by defendant in error in the district court of the first judicial district for Laramie county, November 18, 1886. Tbe petition was filed and summons issued on that day. An affidavit for attachment and the proper undertaking were filed at the same time. The order of attachment was issued December 11th following. This is termed an “alias order,” but it is the only one in the record, and is admitted to be the only one served. It was served December 15, 1886. On the 8th of October…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Salt River Enterprises, Inc. v. HeinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bb v. RsrWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. C. D. Smith Drug Co. v. Casper Drug Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Schloredt v. BoydenWyoming Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API