Legal Opinion

State v. Craft

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 25, 2017No. 20150750-CAPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, Judge:

¶ 1 Justin Paul Craft appeals his convictions for aggravated robbery and aggravated burglary, both first degree felonies. See Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-6-203, -302 (LexisNexis 2012). While we reject Craft’s claim that the eyewitness identifications were unreliable, we ultimately vacate Craft’s convictions and remand for a new trial based upon trial counsel’s ineffective assistance in failing to move for a mistrial due to a detective’s statement that codefendants had placed Craft at the scene of the crime.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 On March 12, 2013, at around 2:00 a.m., a man (the witness)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. LongUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. CloptenUtah Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. KufrinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  2. State v. CrespoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  4. State v. Escobar-FlorezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  5. State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API