State v. Craft
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, Judge:
¶ 1 Justin Paul Craft appeals his convictions for aggravated robbery and aggravated burglary, both first degree felonies. See Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-6-203, -302 (LexisNexis 2012). While we reject Craft’s claim that the eyewitness identifications were unreliable, we ultimately vacate Craft’s convictions and remand for a new trial based upon trial counsel’s ineffective assistance in failing to move for a mistrial due to a detective’s statement that codefendants had placed Craft at the scene of the crime.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 On March 12, 2013, at around 2:00 a.m., a man (the witness)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LongUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. CloptenUtah Supreme Court · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. KufrinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- State v. CrespoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- State v. Escobar-FlorezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.