Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1923No. 13740PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The rights and liabilities growing out of the relationship of husband and wife áre governed by the common law, except in so far as they may have been varied by statute. Heyman v. Heyman, 19 Ga. App. 634 (92 S. E. 25). Statutes in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed. 10 Enc. Dig. Ga. Bep. (Cum. Supp.) 512 (h). The rule last stated is more rigidly applied where the law to be construed consists of a code section, which, though having the force and effect of a statute (Barnes v. Carter, 120 Ga. 895, 897, 48 S. E. 387), is not based *586upon any special statutory enactment, but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heyman v. HeymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Barnes v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Chastain v. JohnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Roberts v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Kilgore v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Mattison v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API