CHEYENNE MIN. AND URANIUM COMPANY v. Federal Resources Corp.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Justice.
This contract-interpretation case requires an examination of the impact of unanticipated agreements concerning the subject matter of the contract, which agreements were entered into by the party whose performance is deemed to be due. Appellant Cheyenne Mining and Uranium Company (CMU) brought this action against appel-lees Federal-American Partners (FAP) and its member corporations, seeking to rescind a contract for the purchase and sale of certain unpatented mining claims, or in the alternative to enforce the contract’s terms. During the trial to the district court, the judge…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Shepard v. Top Hat Land & Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Le Cuno Oil Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Fuchs Murane v. GoeWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Pennzoil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Ricci v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Wyoming Game & Fish Commission v. Mills Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Oil v. RiemerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Sorenson v. FeltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.