Thong v. Andre Chreky Salon
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs Motion [24] to Compel the Production of Documents. Upon consideration of the plaintiffs motion, the defendants’ opposition [25] thereto, the plaintiffs reply [26] brief, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court concludes that the plaintiffs Motion to Compel will be GRANTED. The Court’s reasoning is set forth below.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Jennifer Thong, comes before this Court seeking to compel discovery from defendants Andre Chreky (“Mr. Chreky”), Andre Chreky Salon (the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Food Lion, Incorporated v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio-Clc, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Jerard M. Brune v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Cobell v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ht S.R.L. v. VelascoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Ormeno v. 3624 Georgia Avenue, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Escamilla v. NuyenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015