Legal Opinion
Federal Housing Financing Agency v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 23, 2013No. 11 C 8795PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
THOMAS M. DURKIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Federal Housing Financing Agency (“FHFA”) brought this lawsuit on its own behalf and on behalf of the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) against Defendant City of Chicago. R. 1. FHFA alleges that an ordinance passed by the Chicago City Council in July 2011 unlawfully regulates FHFA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac in their capacity as mortgage investors and mortgagees.1 In particular, the ordinance requires FHFA to file a *1048registration statement…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Arnetia Robinson v. Fed. Housing Fin. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Saxton v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2017
- Skylights LLC v. ByronDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2015
- Radatz v. Fed. Natl. Mtge. Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Radatz v. Fed. Natl. Mtge. Assn. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.