Legal Opinion

National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. Century Indemnity Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 2, 2013No. Case No. 12-cv-1147-MMA-MDDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER:

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff National Steel and Shipbuilding *1267Company’s (“NASSCO”) motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. No. 22], and Defendant Century Indemnity Company’s (“Century”) motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 21]. The parties each filed oppositions and replies to the respective motions. [See Doc. Nos. 24, 27, 31, 33.] For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Brian Barlow v. Officer George Ground, I.D. 9129Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Palmer v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API