Jones v. Hanna
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Thornton.
1DissentThornton, J.
I dissent. In this case I adopt the opinion of the commission, drawn up by Commissioner Vanclief, and concurred in by Belcher and Foote, commissioners, when the case was before Department One of this court, as a clear and correct exposition of the law applicable to it. That opinion is as follows: —
“ This action is upon a promissory note made by Mary L. Hanna to the defendant Bihler, and by him indorsed to the plaintiffs. The defendant Bihler alone answered, and from a judgment against him this appeal is taken upon the judgment roll alone, without any bill of exceptions; and the only error…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Hotel Co. v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McBlair v. GibbesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- President & Trustees v. San Diego & Los Angeles RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Boyd v. BlankmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.