Legal Opinion

Bodine v. McDaniel. Auto Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1918No. 9108PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County: John W. Hayson, Judge. The relator, McDaniel Auto Company, brings action in mandamus against the respondent, Tom Bodine», County Clerk of Oklahoma County. From judgment awarding the peremptory writ, the respondent: appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEWART, O.

The district court, on ax'yplication of the relator, awarded peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the respondent, Tom Bodine, 'as county clerk of Oklahoma county, to attest a warrant oidered by the board of county commissioners of sahl county in imyment of a claim of the relator against the county, duly presented to and allowed by such board, from which action of the trial court ax>peal is duly made.

In resiJonse to the alternative writ the respondent alleges that the warrant ordered was in payment of balance due on an automobile claimed by the board to have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Friend, Co. Atty. v. CummingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Hopley, Treasurer, Etc. v. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. CloudmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Clark v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Lockwood v. TylerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. State Board of Public Affairs v. Principal Funding Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Estus v. State Ex Rel. DinwiddieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API