Butler v. Soule
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a motion to vacate a judgment. D. J. Murphy, Judge rendering judgment. George H. Bahrs, Judge denying motion to vacate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This appeal is taken from an order of the court below entered the fifteenth day of February, 1897, denying the motions of the appellants, said defendant Soule, and said Burt, a tenant in possession of said premises under the mortgagor Soule, to vacate and set aside a judgment and decree of foreclosure made and entered in said court on the 6th of April, 1896. The motion to vacate and set aside said judgment, as stated in the notice for the same, is based upon the ground that it “was and is absolutely void, for the reason that the said court never acquired jurisdiction over the premises…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People ex rel. Schwartz v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Drake v. DuvenickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. NorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.