Legal Opinion
United States v. Madrigal-Valadez
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 1, 2009No. 07-4681PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed by published opinion. Senior Judge ALARCÓN wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge DUNCAN concurred.
OPINION
ALARCÓN, Senior Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, Eliazer Madrigal-Valadez (“Madrigal”) seeks reversal of the district court’s judgment, following a bench trial, that he was guilty of entering Fort Lee, a military installation, for a purpose prohibited by law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1382. 1
Section 1382 provides in relevant part: Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, goes upon any military, naval, or Coast Guard reservation, post, fort, arsenal,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Parker v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Ashon LeftenantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. David B. Pasquantino, United States of America v. Carl J. Pasquantino, United States of America v. Arthur Hilts, A/K/A ButchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Eddie Louthian, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. William JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. JaenschCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Daniel Castendet-Lewis v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.