Huskins, Bryson & Co. v. Hanlon
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Keohuh Cireuit Oourt This action involves tbe question whether certain money is liable to garnishment on execution, the same being the proceeds of the alleged homestead of the defendant "William Hanlon, the execution debtor. The court below held that said money was exempt. The plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
The facts of the case are not in dispute and are as follows: Margaret Hanlon, the wife of William Hanlon, became the owner in fee of sixty-six acres of land in October, 1864, and at about that time she and her said husband took up their residence on said land as their homestead, and continued to so occupy it until the death of Margaret Ham Ion, which occurred in the year 1874. She left a will, by which she devised to her said husband all her personal property, and also all of her real estate during his life, and at his death said real property was to be sold, and one-third of the proceeds was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Benham v. Chamberlain & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
3Cited by8 opinions
- Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Morgan v. RountreeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Kite v. KiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Milberger v. VeselskySupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Harm v. HaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.