Legal Opinion

Harm v. Hale

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

There is but one question involved, and that is whether or not the property claimed by appellee as a home stead is subject to execution sale for the purpose of satisfying a judgment held by the State Savings Bank of Ute.

This judgment for $3,615.95 was obtained against appellee September 22, 1926, on an indebtedness originating April 26, 1917, and renewed from time to time thereafter. Appellee’s original homestead in Ute was acquired during 19.16, which was approximately one year previous to the inception of the indebtedness. That property was sold by appellee in 1918, and it is .claimed by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cowgell v. WarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  2. Benham v. Chamberlain & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  3. First National Bank v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Mann v. CorringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Fardal v. SatreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Millsap v. FaulkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Elliott v. TillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Walters v. Bank of West (In Re Walters)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Blakeslee v. PaulSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. Takes (In Re Takes)District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API