Legal Opinion
Earl Robert Hall v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1969No. 10042PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
Earl Robert Hall was convicted by a jury of taking an automobile, with intent to steal, from Fort Sill, Oklahoma in violation of Section 661, Title 18, United States Code. The evidence showed that the car in question belonged to Michael Rokovena who was a member of the United States Army stationed at Fort Sill at the time of the theft. The car in question was last seen by the owner at Fort Sill where it had been parked. Three witnesses saw Hall driving a car identical with the one stolen shortly after its disappearance from Ft. Sill. An FBI agent testified Hall was driving…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- William Joseph Findley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nina C. Neu v. Frank Grant and Lorna Marie Grant, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Martin BlitsteinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Charles CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- United States of America, Charles L. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Harawese Rhennae MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.