Legal Opinion

Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Philadelphia v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1933No. 24544. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Geraghty, J.—

This is an action brought by Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia, as plaintiff, to enjoin Frigidaire Sales Corporation, Claude G. Bannick, as sheriff of King county, Washington, and another, defendants, from proceeding under replevin to repossess certain refrigerating equipment contained in an apartment house in the city of Seattle. The trial court entered a decree denying injunctive relief and dismissing the action. Plaintiff appeals.

As Frigidaire Sales Corporation is the only respondent having a material interest in the outcome, it will hereafter be referred…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chase v. Tacoma Box Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cherry v. ArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co. v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Washington National Bank v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Neufelder v. Third Street & Suburban RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. HawthorneWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Glen Park Associates, L.L.C. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Reinoehl v. VervaekeWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hall v. WoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Hopkins v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API