Legal Opinion

Stapleton v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1917No. 19280PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Douglas county: Alexander C. Troup, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrissey, O. J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for' personal injuries received while in the employ of defendant. Defendant has made an unusual number of assignments of error, but they all fall within three or four general groups. The injury was received May 9, 1914, while plaintiff was engaged in switching 2 dead engines and 2 shop cars in the yards at Havelock, Nebraska, and is alleged to have been received *202iii tlie following manner: The switch engine was moving in an easterly direction, and plaintiff was riding on an iron step on the south side of one of the dead engines, the step being…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smart v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. GrandonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Battis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. State ex rel. Parmenter v. TroupNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Carlon v. City Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Branch v. WilkinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Kuhlman v. Farmers Union Co-Operative Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hinnenkamp v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Branch v. WilkinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kuhlman v. FARMERS UNION CO-OP. ASS'NNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API