Agua Dulce Supply Co. v. Chapman Milling Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, O. J.
(after stating the case as above).
It appeared the milling company was entitled to maintain its suit in Grayson county, so far as it was against the supply company, notwithstanding the domicile of the latter was in Nueces county, because it (the supply company) had contracted in writing to perform its obligation to the milling company in said Grayson county. Whether the milling company had a right also to maintain the suit in Grayson county so far as it was against Yakey and Mrazek, depended upon whether they were jointly liable with the supply company on the contract between it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Danciger v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Wool Growers' Central Storage Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- McCauley v. McElroyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- India Tire & Rubber Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Stephens v. First Nat. Bank of New BostonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ladner v. Reliance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re Trammell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- Trammell v. Galaxy Ranch School, L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Mims v. East Texas Production Credit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Ladner v. Reliance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.