Legal Opinion

Stahl v. Hammontree

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7780PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Whitley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— Complaint upon notes and mortgage. Appellee recovered judgment below, upon the notes, and was awarded a decree foreclosing the mortgage.

Appellants’ counsel assert that the demurrer ought to have been sustained to the complaint, because the notes are improperly described. If the counsel were correct in their assumption, they would be wrong in their conclusion, for such a defect would not destroy the entire complaint. But they are wrong in their assumption; the notes set out as exhibits correspond exactly with the notes described in the mortgage.

The appellants’ counsel say, and this is all…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mahoney v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. American Insurance v. LeonardIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pancoast v. Travelers InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hake v. BramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API