Legal Opinion

Femi v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 13, 2007No. 06-1585Unpublished

1Per curiam

Sanya Femi, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. Femi claims reopening was warranted because he received insufficient instructions and notice by the immigration judge.

Our review of the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen is extremely deferential, since immigration statutes do not contemplate reopening and the applicable regulations disfavor these motions. Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 744-45 (4th Cir.2006), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1147, 166 L.Ed.2d 997 (2007). This Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aissatou Barry v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. Smith v. NicholsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cohen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API