Aissatou Barry v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Petition for review denied and judgment affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge KING joined.
GREGORY, Circuit Judge.
Aissatou Barry, on behalf of herself and her six-year-old daughter, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen. Because Barry relies on evidence that was available in her initial deportation proceeding, and because Barry did not comply with the requirements of Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988), in asserting her ineffective assistance of counsel claim, we…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Khadija Mohammed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Khadija Ahmed Mohamed v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Tengiz Sevoian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Hugo Castillo-Perez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Massis v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Niang v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Hafza H. Hassan v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Mahaman Haoua v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Sadhvani v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.