Legal Opinion
Rasmusson v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 27, 2005No. 2004-1191Published
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an interference proceeding before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). At issue in the interference proceeding were a set of claims from U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/460,296 (“the ’296 application”), and another set of claims from U.S. Patent Nos. 5,637,310 (“the ’310 patent”) and 5,496,556 (“the ’556 patent”) and their corresponding reissue applications, U.S. Patent Application Serial Nos. 09/964,383 (“the ’310 reissue patent application”) and 09/984,083 (“the ’556 reissue…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Envirotech Corporation v. Al George, Incorporated and Monosep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Celeritas Technologies, Ltd., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- In Re Cruciferous Sprout LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Walter C. Fiers v. Michel Revel and Pierre Tiollais v. Haruo Sugano, Masami Muramatsu and Tadatsugu TaniguchiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.