Legal Opinion · Dissent

Therrell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1937No. 8212Published

1DissentHutcheson, Circuit Judge

The view of the majority, that to tax petitioner in respect of the compensation he receives from the banks he liquidates is to invade and impair the sovereignty of Florida, seems to me illogical and unreal. Illogical and unreal because by law his compensation is to be, it is in fact, paid not by the state from its own funds, but by each bank he liquidates and from the funds of that bank. I recognize the existence and binding force of the holding that to tax officers and employees of a state actually employed in conducting, or in connection with the conduct of, its governmental functions in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Fox Film Corp. v. DoyalSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Helvering v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Burnet v. A. T. Jergins TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API