Legal Opinion

Charter Advanced Servs. (MN), LLC v. Lange

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 7, 2018No. 17-2290PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge.

Charter Communications is a provider of video, internet, and voice communications services. This case arose when Charter underwent a corporate reorganization in order to segregate its Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP") services from its regulated wholesale telecommunications services. As part of the reorganization, Charter moved its VoIP accounts from "Charter Fiberlink" to a newly created affiliate named "Charter Advanced." This led the Minnesota Department of Commerce to lodge a complaint with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission ("MPUC") alleging that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Clark v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Darryl Riddle v. Sergeant Timothy RiepeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  4. Dale Helmig v. Carl FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. Vonage Holdings Corp. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lipschultz v. Charter Advanced Servs. (MN), LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Collector of Winchester, Missouri, and City of Winchester, Missouri v. Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications, LLC, and Charter Fiberlink-Missouri, LLC, and Charter Advanced Services (MO), LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Crown Castle NG East LLC. v. The Town of HempsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  4. USTelecom – The Broadband Association v. Alice Buching Reynolds, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API