Legal Opinion

Lipschultz v. Charter Advanced Servs. (MN), LLC

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 21, 2019No. 18-1386Relating-toCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

2ConcurrenceJustice Thomas, joined by Justice Gorsuch

*7 Charter Advanced Services provides Voice over Internet Protocol services, which allow users to place voice calls over an Internet connection. After the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission attempted to regulate Charter's provision of these services, Charter brought suit in federal court, arguing that the state regulation was pre-empted. The District Court granted summary judgment to Charter. The Eighth Circuit affirmed, reasoning that the Federal Communications…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Department of Transportation v. Association of American RailroadsSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. (PC) Miller v. MedaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. Hnmc, Inc. v. Francis S. Chan, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Leny Rey Chan, Jonathan Chan, and Justin ChanTexas Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Melissa Varela v. Fca US LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2022
  4. People of Michigan v. Montez StovallMichigan Supreme Court · 2022
  5. People of Michigan v. Montez StovallMichigan Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API