Legal Opinion

Presidential Gardens/Duke Street Ltd. Partnership v. Salisbury Slye, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1986No. 85-2353PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Circuit Judge:

Salisbury Slye, Ltd. (Slye) appeals the district court’s decision that Slye defaulted on agreements for the purchase of real estate from Presidential Gardens/Duke Street Limited Partnership and the individual appellees (hereinafter collectively referred to as Presidential Gardens). We conclude that the recorded deed of vacation, which purported to vacate certain lots and streets of a recorded subdivision included in the agreements, was a nullity. Thus, the deed of vacation afforded no justification for Slye’s refusal to settle under the agreements. Accordingly, we affirm.

I

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Town of Chouteau v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. McHenry v. FouttyIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Madbeth, Inc. v. WeadeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  5. Barrett v. BallardMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Presidential Gardens/Duke Street Limited Partnership v. Salisbury Slye, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API