Legal Opinion

Smothers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1981No. WD 31658PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Presiding Judge.

In this Rule 27.26 proceedings, appellant contends that his trial counsel was ineffective by reason of failure to call certain witnesses. Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree, with a sentence of life imprisonment, and the judgment of conviction was affirmed in State v. Smothers, 518 S.W.2d 187 (Mo.App.1974).

On this appeal, appellant contends first that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because he failed to call Davis and Patricia Saulmon as his witnesses “at a time when appellant’s trial counsel was operating under an ethical conflict.”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Charles v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Sherrill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Bennett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Allen v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API