Legal Opinion

Rawlins v. T. P. Kennard & Son

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Hayward, J. cited: Harris v. Kennedy, 4 N. W. R. 651; Wiley v. Shars, 21 Neb. 712; Jones on Chattel Mortgages, secs. 644, 645, 662. cited: Jones on Mortgages, 3d Ed., vol. 2, sec. 971; Shaver v. Williams, 87 111. 469; Banta v. Qarmo, 1 Sanford Ch. (N. Y.) 383; Anglade v. St. Avid, 67 Mo. 434.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

' This is an action of replevin brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error to recover the possession of a span of mules. On the trial of the cause in the court below, a verdict was rendered in favor of the defendants in error, and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, judgment was entered on the verdict.

The testimony shows that on the 30th day of July, 1885, one G. E. Harper executed a chattel mortgage upon the following described property:

“ One Belleville 32 in. thresher, No. 4281; one twelve-*183horse Woodbury Power, No. 167, and equalizer, made by the Harrison…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith & Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Bell v. PrewittIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Jordan v. Hamilton County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Peters v. ParsonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. SutherlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. McConnell v. LangdonIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Alferitz v. IngallsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
  4. George Adams & Frederick Co. v. South Omaha Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. Gould v. HuffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API