Looney v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
This is a bastardy proceeding, instituted by Coretta Hines before a justice of the peace. The appellant was bound over to the circuit court for trial.
It is first insisted that prejudicial error prevailed by the action of the court in overruling the defendant’s motion to quash the proceedings because the appearance bond of the defendant did not require him to appear at the next session of the circuit court. We do not accord to appellant’s insistence in this connection. Williams v. State, 113 Ala. 58, 21 So. 463. In that case the Supreme Court held, where a defendant in bastardy proceeding's is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Merritt v. FlemmingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
- Wilson v. Judge of the Co. CourtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vinson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
- Warner v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Vinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934