Diversified Financial Systems Inc. v. Binstock
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Diversified Financial Systems, Inc. appealed a jury verdict and judgment dismissing Diversified’s action against Simon Binstock on his guaranty of a note, and appealed the order denying Diversified’s post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law. We conclude substantial evidence supported the jury verdict that the FDIC’s agents waived Binstoek’s obligation on the guaranty, and we affirm.
[¶2] Simon Binstock, who farmed near Regent, had been a longtime customer of First State Bank of Regent. Besides his own borrowings from the Bank, he signed a guaranty to the Bank on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Williston Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Steiger Tractor, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Erickson v. SchwanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Pioneer Fuels, Inc. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Peterson Mechanical, Inc. v. NeresonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sanders v. Gravel Products, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Forster v. West Dakota Veterinary Clinic, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Minto Grain, LLC v. TibertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Symington v. MayoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Braunberger v. Interstate Engineering, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.