Legal Opinion
Wheaton v. Kulongoski
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 29, 2006No. 0301-01063; A122863PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*358LINDER, P. J.
Petitioners are individuals who received benefits under the state’s “medically needy” program, which is administered by the Department of Human Services (DHS). In late 2002, in response to budget cuts, DHS decided not to allocate funds to the program and to terminate it. DHS issued notices to petitioners advising them that their benefits under the medically needy program would be terminated, effective February 1, 2003. The notices also advised petitioners that they were not entitled to a hearing to contest DHS’s decision to terminate their benefits. Some or all of the petitioners…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh, Acting Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Oregon Health Care Ass'n v. Health DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Oregon Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Oregon Environmental Council v. Oregon State Board of EducationOregon Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Coleman v. Oregon Parks & Recreation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Rooklidge v. DmvCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Mountain Woodworks, Inc. v. VossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.