Legal Opinion

(PC) Spence v. Kaur

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 12, 2022No. 2:16-cv-01828Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 G. KAUR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. In his civil rights 19 complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff alleges that defendants Kaur and Chambers retaliated 20 against plaintiff for exercising his First Amendment rights. (ECF No. 89.) Defendants’ fully- 21 briefed motion for summary judgment is before the court.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API