State v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKorsmo, J.
¶1 Evidence of street gang affiliation is admissible in a criminal trial if there is a nexus between the crime and gang membership. The trial court admitted gang evidence in Joshua Scott’s trial subject to the prosecution providing evidence of the connection. That evidence was never produced. We conclude that this error was not harmless, reverse the defendant’s convictions, and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
¶2 Mr. Scott was a methamphetamine dealer. He supplied Mr. Shannon Younger who, in turn, sold drugs to others. One of Mr. Younger’s clients was Wendy Grey *522Vannauker, whom he also dated.1 At…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Dawson v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. LoughWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. HighCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. DeLeonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.