Legal Opinion

Harper v. Silva

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1987No. 86-273PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Finding no controlling precedent, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska has certified three questions of law, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-219 (Reissue 1985), to this court. The facts giving rise to the controversy in this case have been recited to us as follows.

The parties to the action in the U.S. District Court are plaintiff, Thomas G. Harper, and defendants Dr. Norberto R. Silva and Falls City Surgical Associates. The State of Nebraska Excess Liability Fund was originally impleaded as a third-party defendant, then later named as a defendant in a separate complaint. At…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sexton v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Witherspoon v. Sides Const. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Crossley v. Pacific Employers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hataway v. McKinleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fitts v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Dowis v. Mud Slingers, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Chambers v. Dakotah Charter, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Inacom Corp., a Delaware Corporation v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API