Legal Opinion
Cowan v. Woodrum
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1971No. B-2887PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR
2Per curiam
Respondent, Walter Woodrum, brought suit against Petitioners for damages resulting from an alleged breach of a contract connected with sale of certain bank stock. Petitioners moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 166-A, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and Respondent did not move for summary judgment. The trial court granted Petitioners’ motion, entering summary judgment that Respondent take nothing.
The Court of Civil Appeals reversed and proceeded to render judgment for Respondent, except as to the amount of damages, the judgment reading in part as…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Hinojosa v. EdgertonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Woodrum v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
4Cited by22 opinions
- Crum & Forster, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
- Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, Inc. v. CampesiTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. C.I.T. Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
- Alamo National Bank of San Antonio v. HurdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- 626 Joint Venture v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.