Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1993No. 9215SC521PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant presents six assignments of error for our review. By his first assignment of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion regarding his presence in the court. Defendant, however, makes no argument and cites no authority in support of his contention. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 28(b)(5) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that appellant’s arguments “contain citations of authority upon which the appellant relies.” See Byrne v. Bordeaux, 85 N.C. App. 262, 354 S.E.2d 277 (1987). Because defendant has failed to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lake Mary Ltd. Partnership v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Coastal Plains Utilities, Inc. v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. StreeterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Jenkins v. Piedmont Aviation ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. Huu the CaoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API