Nen Thio v. Genji, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Re: Dkt. No. 37
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
Nathanael M. Cousins, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiffs move for preliminary approval of the settlement of this putative class action and collective action. Because plaintiffs have made a sufficient showing for the purposes of preliminary approval, the Court grants their motion. The Court also conditionally certifies a class action and a collective action for purposes of the settlement and approves the proposed notice to the class.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Plaintiffs’ Allegations
Plaintiffs Nen Thio, Tju Tjin Liem, and Denny Wijaya…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Kerzich v. Cnty. of TuolumneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Magadia v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Rodriguez v. Danell Custom Harvesting, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Beltran v. Olam Spices and Vegetables, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Beltran v. Olam Spices and Vegetables, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.