Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Edwin Affron Kartman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1969No. 22984_1Published

1DissentJames M. Carter, Circuit Judge

I must respectfully dissent.

This is an unusual case. A divinity student is charged with assaulting a deputy U. S. Marshal. He admits kicking the Marshal. His defense was twofold. First he claimed he did not know the person kicked was a U. S. Marshal. This was resolved against him by the trial court and by the majority here in its correct holding that knowledge of the official status of the victim of the assault is not an element of the offense under 18 U.S.C. § 111.

Second, his factual defense was that he went to the aid of a person he believed was being assaulted. He received complete and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Piero Heliczer, Jack William Martin, Iii, and Jack v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. Robert Henry Sykes and Haydon David Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Robert Donald Hodgdon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. George Richard Walks on Top v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. Magness v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API