Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. of North America v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1912No. 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Rogers County; J. I. Howard, Special Judge. Action by William Taylor against the Insurance Cdmpany of North America. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The sole question presented for our consideration in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error is that the trial court erred in refusing to submit or state the conclusions of fact found separately from the conclusions of law. The case was tried before the court; a jury being waived. Defendant’s motion or request for special findings of fact and conclusions of law was submitted in writing at the conclusion of the testimony, and called for a finding by the court upon five specific questions of fact, with an additional request for the court to find upon all other matei-ial…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Cruzan v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Oklahoma City Electric, Gas & Power Co. v. BaumhoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Taylor v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Hicklin v. McClearOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cochran v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. German State Bank of Elk City v. PtachekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Goodall v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. McAlpin v. HixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Reed v. Richards & Conover Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Grant v. MathisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API