Legal Opinion

People v. Roccaforte

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 24, 1996No. 96SA52PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

The prosecution brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to section 16-12-102(2), 8A C.R.S. (1986), and C.A.R. 4.1 challenging the trial court’s order suppressing evidence obtained from searches of Defendant Daniel Roeeaforte’s residence and of a storage space rented by Defendant Martin Petroleum, Inc. Defendants Daniel Roccaforte, Jr., Michael Roccaforte and Martin Petroleum, Inc. were charged with theft,1 conspiracy,2 filing false tax returns,3 tax evasion,4 and failure to truthfully account for and pay over taxes.5 Defendants moved to suppress all evidence obtained from searches…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  2. People v. StatonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. HerreraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  4. Peo v. AlbrittonColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. People v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API