Clark v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtRichard S. Heller, J.
The above-entitled actions were tried before this court without a jury and were to be considered so-called test cases on the Tie Line of the State Power Authority which runs from Niagara Falls to just west of Utica.
*578These three cases were chosen as representing three different types of property, i.e., Clark, farm property; Thom, residential subdivision property; and First National City Trust Company, etc., industrial property.
In each case a decision was rendered in favor of the claimant for actual damages for the land appropriated together with consequential damages in each case which included…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dillenbeck v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
- Robinson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Fogarty v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
- Osann v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clark v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Olin v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1964
- Wineburgh v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1963