Pastewka v. Texaco, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
The question presented is whether on the facts of this case plaintiffs are precluded from pursuing a cause of action in the District of Delaware after dismissal of an identical action on the grounds of forum non conveniens has been upheld by a divided panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Procedural facts, unfortunately somewhat detailed but nonetheless essential to an understanding of a resolution of the question, are set forth below:
Plaintiffs are the owners of cargo aboard the M.V. Brandenburg, a German vessel, and the personal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- All States Freight, Inc. v. ModarelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mizokami Bros. Of Arizona, Inc. v. Mobay Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Phoenix Canada Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- West Coast Management & Capital, LLC v. Carrier Access Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
- Bromley v. MitchellAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Pastewka v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.