Legal Opinion

Pastewka v. Texaco, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 11, 1976No. Civ. A. 4550-4561, 76-54PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

The question presented is whether on the facts of this case plaintiffs are precluded from pursuing a cause of action in the District of Delaware after dismissal of an identical action on the grounds of forum non conveniens has been upheld by a divided panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Procedural facts, unfortunately somewhat detailed but nonetheless essential to an understanding of a resolution of the question, are set forth below:

Plaintiffs are the owners of cargo aboard the M.V. Brandenburg, a German vessel, and the personal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. All States Freight, Inc. v. ModarelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mizokami Bros. Of Arizona, Inc. v. Mobay Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Phoenix Canada Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
  3. West Coast Management & Capital, LLC v. Carrier Access Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  4. Bromley v. MitchellAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pastewka v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API