Charles v. City of Marion
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana
In Equity. On motion for temporary restraining order.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, District Judge.
The supreme court of this state has expressed no recent opinion upon the constitutionality of the statute (Burns’ Rev. St. 1894, § 3626) providing that lot owners “shall be liable to the city for their proportion of the costs of street and alley improvements in the ratio of the front line of their lots owned by them to the whole improved line of the street and alley improvements.” Prior to the decision in Village of Norwood v. Baker, 172 U. S. 269, 19 Sup. Ct. 187, 43 L. Ed. 443, the supreme court of this state and of many other states had held that state legislation…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
3Cited by13 opinions
- Adams v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- King v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. ToolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Times Pub. Co. v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Utah, N. & C. R. v. Utah & C. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.