Armstrong v. Ellington
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT M. McRAE, Jr., District Judge.
In this case the plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment of the uneonstitutionality of the Tennessee criminal statute described in its caption as “Prowling or traveling for purposes of destroying property or intimidating citizens— Threats or intimidation — Penalty” T.C. A. § 39-2805. It is alleged that the statute is vague and overbroad, and therefore chills the exercise of First Amendment rights. Plaintiffs also seek injunctive relief prohibiting their trial in the state court where they have been indicted for violation of portions of the statute.
All…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. GunzelmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- State v. SchweppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Musgrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- State v. EastmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.